Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4):e2020.00070. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00070

Table 2.

Association of Small Bowel Obstruction with Route of Hysterectomy and Additional Risk Factors: Logistic Regression Models

Univariable Analysis
Multivariable Model
Multivariable Model 2
OR 95% CI p-Value AOR 95% CI p-Value AOR 95% CI p-Value
Route of hysterectomy (reference = abdominal)
Laparoscopic 0.43 (0.20, 0.92) .0299 0.54 (0.23, 1.23) .1410
Vaginal 0.10 (0.01, 0.76) .0255 0.18 (0.02, 1.37) .0968
Laparoscopic + Vaginal 0.33 (0.16, 0.68) .0025 0.44 (0.20, 0.98) 0.0444
Age 1.03 (1.00, 1.05) .0477 1.01 (0.97, 1.04) .6856 AOR’s, 95% CI’s and p-values very similar to multivariable model 1 and not shown
BMI 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) .5398 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) .9179
Tobacco use* 1.09 (0.38, 3.11) .8705 1.09 (0.37, 3.20) .8741
Diabetes* 1.20 (0.50, 2.90) .6816 0.79 (0.30, 2.08) .6356
Bowel injury* 12.48 (4.38, 35.51) <.0001 10.14 (3.09, 33.27) .0001
Malignancy* 4.00 (2.09, 7.65) <.0001 2.81 (1.14, 6.90) .0241
Estimated blood loss 1.11 (1.05, 1.18) .0002 1.06 (1.00, 1.14) .0678
Prior cesarean section* 0.83 (0.38, 1.81) .6347 0.84 (0.37, 1.92) .6812
Lysis of adhesions* 2.34 (1.20, 4.53) .0120 1.82 (0.85, 3.89) .1206

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index.

n = 1630; 40 (2.4%) with small bowel obstruction.

*

reference = no.