Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;7(1):e10. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.137

Table 3.

Regression analysis to show how sickness absence and job satisfaction are associated with discrimination and BHAa

n % Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Sickness absence (2 weeks in past year)
Discrimination – experienced
 No 72 9 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00
 Yes 37 19 2.32 1.49–3.62 2.29 1.41–3.74 1.98 1.18–3.34
BHA – experienced
 No 347 58 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00
 Yes 66 39 2.21 1.46–3.36 2.48 1.60–3.85 2.11 1.34–3.30
Job satisfaction
Discrimination – experienced
 No 555 74 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00
 Yes 101 52 0.37 0.26–0.51 0.38 0.26–0.54 0.38 0.27–0.55
BHA – experienced
 No 162 60 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00 1.00 1.00–1.00
 Yes 237 37 0.40 0.29–0.53 0.39 0.29–0.54 0.39 0.29–0.54

BHA, bullying, harassment and abuse.

a.

Numbers (n), weighted percentages (%), odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs are shown.

Model 1: crude.

Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, migrant status, sexual orientation, occupational role and pay band.

Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, migrant status, sexual orientation, occupational role, pay band and long-standing health problems, illness or disability.