Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 7;21:25. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01384-0

Table 3.

Change of titanium surfaces after ultrasonic instrumentation with different tips based on SEM imaging

I II III IV
Surface type Moderate rough Moderate rough No pre- instrumentation machined
Surface morphology Tip remnants Tip remnants Tip remnants Tipremnants
A Loss of characteristic morphology, flatter None Loss of characteristic morphology, flatter None visible traces of instrumentation, slightly flatter None Scratches, rougher None
 (n = 4 × 8)
B Slightly flatter Sporadic Slightly flatter Sporadic No changes Sporadic No changes None
 (n = 4 × 8)
C Loss of characteristic morphology, flatter None Loss of characteristic morphology, flatter None visible traces of instrumentation, slightly flatter None Scratches, rougher None
 (n = 4 × 8)
D No changes Sporadic No surface changes Slight No changes Slight No changes None
 (n = 4 × 8)
E No changes abundant No surface changes abundant No changes abundant No changes None
 (n = 4 × 8)

Disc I—Inicell, Disc II—SLA, Disc III—non pretreated, Disc IV—machined

A—steel, B—PEEK, C—titanium, D—carbon, E—resin