Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;21:42. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07735-y

Table 3.

Factors associated with poor optimal surgical outcomes

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
PR (95% CI) P value PR (95% CI) P value
Sex
 Male Reference 0.295
 Female 0.74 (0.42, 1.30)
Age, mean (SD) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.684
BMI 1.02 (0.99, 1.05) 0.191
Setting of Surgery
 - Tertiary Hospital Reference 0.878 Reference 0.947
 - Non- tertiaty hospital 0.98 (0.71, 1.32) 1.01 (0.75, 1.37)
Tumor size (n = 306), mean (SD) 1.01 (1.00, 1.02) 0.001 1.01 (1.00, 1.02) 0.182
Tumor focality, n (%)
 - Unifocal Reference 0.425
 - Multifocal 1.13 (0.84, 1.53)
Positive Central Cervical Lymph nodes metastasis, n (%)
 - No Reference 0.004 Reference 0.017
 - Yes 1.54 (1.15, 2.06) 1.45 (1.07, 1.97)
MACIS score 1.14 (1.02, 1.28) 0.017 1.08 (0.94, 1.24) 0.285
Histology variant
 - Non- aggresive Reference 0.651
 - Aggresive 1.11 (0.70, 1.79)
Risk recurrence
 Very low risk Referencea
 Low risk
 Indeterminate risk 0.95 (0.51, 1.77) 0.861
 High risk 0.95 (0.19, 4.73) 0.946

a For univariate and multivariate analysis low and very low risk categories were combined and taken as reference