Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 7;14:14. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01858-x

Table 2.

Experimental parameters of DNP enhancement

Figure number Sample Matrix and protocol Rotor type Year Build-up time (s) MAS (kHz) εon/off
Figure 2a WT 13C-depleted, d8-glycerol/D2O/H2O (60/30/10 vol%) ZrO2 thin-wall rotor 2018 2.77 10 26
Additional file 1: Fig.S2a ctl1 ctl2 13C-depleted, d8-glycerol/D2O/H2O (60/30/10 vol%) 2.59 10 22
Figure 3a ctl1 13C-depleted, d8-glycerol/D2O/H2O (60/30/10 vol%) Sapphire rotor 2020 2.64 8 38
Figure 3a ctl1 d6-DMSO/D2O/H2O (80/10/10 vol%) 1.96 8 48
Figure 3a ctl1 D2O/H2O(75/25 vol%) 8 42
Figure 3a ctl1 D2O (matrix-free) 1.67 8 57
Additional file 1: Fig. S2b ctl1 ctl2 D2O (matrix-free) 1.40 10.5 44

The related figure position of each matrix protocol is given. Unidentified (–). The samples freshly measured in 2020 give high sensitivity enhancement of 38–57 fold due to the use of sapphire rotor, optimization of sample preparation, and the improvement of the DNP instruments