Table 2.
TF Production Diversity | TF Consumption Diversity | TF Consumption Frequency | Wild Food Consumption Diversity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional food (TF) practices | ||||
TF consumption diversity | 0.61*** | |||
TF consumption frequency | 0.33*** | 0.51*** | ||
Wild food consumption diversity | – | 0.30*** | – | |
Sociodemographics | ||||
Age | 0.24** | – | – | – |
Monthly income per capita | −0.21** | – | 0.28*** | – |
Time to market | – | – | – | – |
Education completed | – | – | 0.25* | – |
Farmer category (agroecological) | 0.54*** | 0.57*** | 0.35*** | – |
Farm Production Diversity | 0.58*** | 0.51*** | 0.40*** | 0.24** |
Caloric share of diet acquired from diverse sources | ||||
Conventional markets | −0.38*** | −0.41*** | −0.34*** | – |
Harvest | 0.28*** | 0.30*** | 0.28*** | – |
Social economy | 0.20 | 0.23** | – | – |
Correlations are reported using Pearson’s or Spearman’s Rho (R), according to variable distribution. Farmer category is a dummy variable with agroecological set at 1 and reference at 0. Education completed is treated as a continuous variable with values from 0 (none) to 5 (post-secondary). Correlations with R < 0.20 are considered too small to be meaningful and are thus removed for clarity. *, ** and *** indicate significance at the 10, 5 and 1% levels, respectively.