Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;21(2):164. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9595

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pooled sensitivities and specificities of different imaging techniques for malignancy detection in patients with gastric cancer. Forest plot indicating the pooled sensitivity and specificity of (A) FDG PET for lymph node metastasis; (B) FDG PET for distant metastasis; (C) FDG PET for recurrent gastric cancer; (D) CECT for lymph node metastasis; (E) CECT for distant metastasis; and (F) CECT for recurrent gastric cancer. CECT, contrast-enhanced computed tomography; FDG PET, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; df, degrees of freedom.