Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;54(1):61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.12.005

Table 4.

Diagnostic performances of continuous studied variables and cut-off levels.

AUC [IC 95%] Cut-off level Sensitivity [IC 95%] Specificity [IC 95%] Positive predictive value [IC 95%] Negative predictive value [IC 95%] p-value
CRP (mg/L) 0.759 [0.671–0.846] 36 80.7% [68.4–89.0] 64.5% [52.0–75.2] 67.6% 78.4% N/A
Eosinophil count (G/L) 0.852 [0.784–0.920] 0.010 86% [74.3–92.9] 79.7% [68.1–87.8] 79% 86.4% 0.0845a
Lymphocyte count (G/L) 0.754 [0.667–0.842] 1.520 91.2% [80.5–96.5] 56.3% [44.1–67.7] 65% 87.8%
Eo/PMN ratio × 1000 0.846 [0.778–0.914] 3.344 87.7% [76.3–94.1] 73.4% [61.4–82.7] 74.6% 87.0% 0.0003b
Ly/PMN ratio × 1000 0.621 [0.521–0.721] 203.98 59.6% [46.7–71.4] 64.1% [51.8–74.7] 59.6% 64.1%

CRP: C-reactive protein; Eo: eosinophil; PMN: polymorphonuclear neutrophil; Ly: lymphocyte; AUC: area under curve; N/A: not applicable; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

a

Comparison between eosinophil count and lymphocyte count AUC using Delong's method.

b

Comparison between Eo/PMN ratio × 1000 and Ly/PMN ratio × 1000 AUC using Delong's method.