Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 2;319(6):H1358–H1368. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00293.2020

Table 1.

Optical mapping and anatomic parameters for each group

Sham
TAC
TAC + CNO
Parameter n n n Brown-Forsythe Sham vs. TAC TAC vs. TAC + CNO
Optical mapping
 APD60, ms
  250 ms PCL 56.41 (8.470) 6 75.78 (10.82) 5 66.56 (12.92) 6 0.7338 0.0108 0.1842
  150 ms PCL 55.30 (6.252) 7 58.52 (2.217) 5 53.36 (6.677) 6 0.4341 0.3447 0.1516
 APDss, ms 57.90 (6.799) 7 78.27 (7.704) 5 65.46 (10.60) 7 0.5458 0.0010 0.0220
 APD60 restitution vector angle, ° 189.0 (6.943) 7 202.2 (18.93) 5 190.9 (5.661) 6 0.2435 0.0619 0.1176
 CV at 250 ms PCL, cm/s 61.00 (12.69) 6 38.95 (4.926) 5 41.78 (5.825) 6 0.1794 0.0010 0.6017
 %Change in number of pixels 0.09408 (0.4026) 6 −19.42 (17.08) 5 −0.9820 (1.075) 5 0.0012 N/A N/A
 APD60 vs. DI total percentage, %
  250 ms PCL 56.07 (12.88) 6 45.00 (16.78) 5 59.10 (14.00) 6 0.8857 0.2274 0.1303
  150 ms PCL 62.66 (12.59) 7 37.28 (12.20) 5 66.46 (11.78) 6 0.8678 0.0029 0.0013
Anatomy
 Body weight, g 513.0 (96.49) 7 382.6 (66.58) 5 444.6 (23.17) 7 0.2121 0.0054 0.1463
 LV, mm 3.159 (0.5132) 7 4.350 (0.2904) 5 3.993 (0.5507) 7 0.5213 0.0007 0.2251
 Septum, mm 2.334 (0.6166) 7 3.410 (0.3654) 5 3.173 (0.2694) 7 0.3010 0.0009 0.3822
 RV, mm 1.670 (0.4181) 7 1.714 (0.2990) 5 1.661 (0.3598) 7 0.9492 0.8414 0.8111

Values are means (SD); n, number of samples. Brown-Forsythe test for equal variance P values reported. Planned contrast analysis of Sham vs. TAC and TAC vs. TAC + CNO reported with P values from Fisher’s least significant difference test. APD60, action potential duration at 60% repolarization; APDss, APD at fitted steady state; CV, conduction velocity; DI, diastolic interval; LV, left ventricle; N/A, not applicable; PCL, pacing cycle length; RV, right ventricle. LV, septum, and RV are wall thickness measurements.