Table 1.
Comparison of conduction velocities of SARs and RARs
| SARs |
RARs |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range, m/s (n) | Mean, m/s | Range, m/s (n) | Mean, m/s | Species | Reference |
| 8–35* (10) | 20.2 | 8–12* (4) | 9.1 | Cat | Knowlton and Larrabee, 1946 (16) |
| 14–59 (57) | 36 ± 1.3 | 16–37 (10) | 25 ± 2.2 | Cat | Paintal, 1953 (24) |
| 5–68.5 (100) | 32.3 ± 11.8 | 12–40 (41) | 23.3 ± 7.1 | Dog | Sampson and Vidruk, 1975 (26) |
| 17–66 (27) | 32.0 ± 2.0 | 11–52 (29) | 31.9 ± 1.7 | Dog | Jonzon et al., 1988 (15) |
RARs, rapidly adapting receptors; SARS, slowly adapting receptors. For a mean of 9 m/s, the highest possible conduction velocity of RARs is 12 m/s (if the individual ones were 8, 8, 8, and 12 m/s). The lowest possible conduction velocity of SARs is 8 m/s. n in the parentheses refers to the number of afferents tested.
This is assumed according to the text.