Table 2.
Lifelong Exercisers |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
YE | Combined | LLE-P | LLE-F | OH | |
Total training years | 5 ± 1* | 53 ± 1 | 53 ± 1 | 53 ± 3 | |
Competitive focusa | Yes | Yes | No | ||
Lifetime average | |||||
Frequency, days/wk | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | ||
Duration, h/wk | 7.3 ± 0.5 | 7.6 ± 0.7 | 6.6 ± 0.9 | ||
Intensityb | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1‡ | 1.8 ± 0.1 | ||
Current decade | |||||
Frequency, days/wk | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.7 | |
Duration, h/wk | 7.0 ± 0.7 | 8.1 ± 1.1 | 8.5 ± 1.4 | 7.4 ± 1.9 | |
Intensityb | 2.8 ± 0.1* | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1‡ | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
Values are means ± SE. YE, young exercisers; LLE-P, lifelong exercisers-performance; LLE-F, lifelong exercisers-fitness; OH, old healthy. In the case that a subject reported >1 training intensity, values were weighted and averaged (e.g., 80% of training at a 2 and 20% of training at a 3 resulted in an overall intensity of 2.2). More detailed exercise training histories are presented by us elsewhere (16).
Competitive focus indicates exercise training for the purpose of competition was currently or once a primary goal for the majority of the group. Lifetime average reflects current decade exercise habits for YE.
Levels of self-reported training intensity were: 1 (Light), 2 (Moderate), and 3 (Hard).
P ≤ 0.05 vs. LLE Combined;
P ≤ 0.05 LLE-P vs. LLE-F.