Table 5.
Lame | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Category | Parameter estimate | Odds ratio | Confidence interval (95%) | P-value |
Intercept | −1.82 | 0.16*** | 0.06–0.43 | < 0.001 | |
BCS | Optimal | Reference | – | – | – |
Overconditioned | −0.14 | 0.87 | 0.48–1.59 | 0.656 | |
Underconditioned | 0.46 | 1.59* | 1.10–2.30 | 0.014 | |
Parity | 1 | Reference | – | – | – |
2 | 0.0021 | 1.00 | 0.62–1.61 | 0.993 | |
≥ 3 | 1.00 | 2.71*** | 1.83–4.01 | < 0.001 | |
Milk yield | Continuousa | −0.02 | 0.98* | 0.96–1.00 | 0.05 |
Leg cleanliness | Little/no manure | Reference | – | – | – |
Minor splashing | 0.03 | 1.03 | 0.71–1.50 | 0868 | |
Distinct plaques of manure | 0.47 | 1.61* | 1.00–2.61 | 0.05 | |
Solid plaque of manure | 0.94 | 1.30 | 0.66–2.57 | 0.443 | |
Hocks | No observable skin change | Reference | – | – | – |
Hairless patch | 0.26 | 1.30 | 0.76–2.20 | 0.338 | |
Swelling and/or wound | 0.94 | 2.56** | 1.43–4.61 | 0.002 | |
Rib swelling | No | Reference | – | – | – |
yes | 1.03 | 2.81*** | 1.70–4.64 | < 0.001 | |
Farming type | Conventional farming | Reference | – | – | – |
Organic farming | −0.46 | 0.63 | 0.35–1.14 | 0.125 | |
Length of stalls | Long | Reference | – | – | – |
Medium | 0.56 | 1.76* | 1.07–2.87 | 0.025 | |
Short | 1.15 | 3.17*** | 1.93–5.19 | < 0.001 | |
Farm size | Small Medium Large |
Reference0.290.55 | – 1.34 1.72 |
–0.87–2.081.15–2.58 | – 0.189 0.008 |
Year | 2016 2017 2018 2019 |
Reference−0.89−0.85−0.84 | – 0.41 0.43 0.43 |
–0.20–0.820.22–0.840.19–0.96 | – 0.012 0.014 0.040 |
Out of the initial 22 predictors, 10 factors associated with housing conditions and the individual animal were maintained within the final model. The model incorporated data from 1,006 dairy cows on 56 farms.
1 unit increase.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, and
p < 0.001.