Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;26(1):e99–e110. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0022

Table 3.

Two‐step multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

Variables Relative risk (95% CI) p value
Development cohort
Step 1
Age 1.161 (1.075–1.253) <.001
Race 0.987 (0.962–1.013) .325
Site 1.001 (0.999–1.003) .190
Histological type 1.300 (1.133–1.491) <.001
Size 1.000 (0.998–1.001) .696
Surgical procedure 1.169 (1.079–1.266) <.001
Grade 0.998 (0.995–1.000) .087
LN examined 0.751 (0.665–0.848) <.001
ypTNM staging (AJCC 8th) 1.717 (1.561–1.888) <.001
Step 2
Age 1.164 (1.078–1.257) <.001
Race 0.988 (0.960–1.016) .388
Site 1.001 (0.999–1.002) .355
Histological type 1.260 (1.098–1.446) .001
Size 1.000 (0.998–1.001) .850
Surgical procedure 1.14 (1.061–1.245) .001
Grade 0.998 (0.995–1.000) .106
LN examined 0.661 (0.583–0.749) <.001
ypTNM staging (AJCC 8th) 1.018 (0.880–1.179) .807
Modified ypTNM staging 1.540 (1.403–1.691) <.001
Validation cohort
Step 1
Site 0.889 (0.725–1.089) .255
Size 1.008 (1.000–1.016) .047
Grade 1.001 (0.994–1.008) .748
ypTNM staging (AJCC 8th) 1.892 (1.463–2.446) <.001
Step 2
Site 0.924 (0.755–1.131) .445
Size 1.007 (0.999–1.015) .080
Grade 1.002 (0.995–1.009) .590
ypTNM staging (AJCC 8th) 0.965 (0.630–1.476) .868
Modified ypTNM staging 1.636 (1.278–2.096) <.001

Step 1, with consideration of all significantly important prognostic factors in univariate analysis except for the modified ypTNM stage; step 2, with consideration of all significantly important prognostic factors in univariate analysis, including the modified ypTNM stage.

Abbreviations: AJCC 8th, American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition; CI, confidence interval; LN, lymph node.