Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;12:182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20526-0

Fig. 3. PT inhibition enhances the rewarding properties of cocaine.

Fig. 3

a Baseline: Rats freely explore chamber for 20 min. Conditioning: Rats receive three pairings/side of saline and 10 mg/kg cocaine, i.p. (for conditioned place preference (CPP) validation) or vehicle (VEH) + cocaine and CNO (5 mg/kg, i.p.) (or LED light; 20 Hz, 20 ms pulses) + cocaine (modified CPP paradigm) over 3 days (2 conditioning sessions/day). CPP test: 24 h post-conditioning, rats freely explore chamber for 20 min. bi Bar and whisker plots where bars represent the mean ± SEM difference in time spent on a side between the post-conditioning CPP test and the Baseline pretest. b Validation: Rats spent significantly more time on the cocaine-paired side (orange) than the saline-paired side, indicating a CPP to cocaine. N = 4. c IT hM4Di: There was no difference in the time spent on the CNO + cocaine-paired side (purple) compared to the VEH + cocaine-paired side, indicating that IT inhibition does not modulate cocaine reward. N = 6. d PT hM4Di: Rats spent significantly more time on the CNO + cocaine-paired side (green) than the VEH + cocaine-paired side, indicating that PT inhibition enhances cocaine reward. N = 6. e PT ChR2: Rats spent significantly less time on the light + cocaine-paired side (green) compared to cocaine alone, indicating that PT stimulation decreases cocaine reward. N = 4. f There was no difference in the time spent when rats received VEH or CNO (green) prior to saline on each side, indicating that PT inhibition alone is not reinforcing. N = 5. g There was no difference in the time spent when rats received light + saline (green) compared to saline alone, indicating that PT stimulation alone is not aversive. N = 4. h Validation: Rats spent significantly more time on the M&M candy-paired side (orange) compared to the food-paired side, indicating a CPP to a hedonic natural reward. N = 9. i PT hM4Di: There was no difference in the time spent on the CNO + M&M-paired side (green) compared to the VEH + M&M-paired side, indicating that PT inhibition does not modulate the rewarding properties of a natural reinforcer. N = 6, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, paired t-test.