Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):291. doi: 10.3390/s21010291

Table 1.

Summary of highlighted research articles for tremor analysis using wearable sensors.

Work Year Sensors and Location Participants Analysis Methods Main Aims or Findings Main Results
Patel et al. [36] 2010 8 uniaxial accelerometers, located on the arms and legs 12 PD patients Machine learning: Support Vector Machines The results indicate that is possible to estimate clinical scores with a low error Error values of 3.4% for tremor detection using hand-crafted features.
Rigas et al. [37] 2012 6 accelerometers located on the wrists, ankles, sternum, and the waist 23 subjects (18 PD patients and 5 healthy controls) Hidden Markov model High accuracy in tremor detection. It is possible to discriminate tremors from other PD symptoms. Accuracy of 87% for tremor severity, maximum specificity 97%, and sensitivity 95%
Roy et al. [38] 2013 EMG and 4 accelerometers located on both forearms and shanks 11 PD for training, and 12 for testing (8 PD + 4 healthy controls) Machine learning: Dynamic neural network The use of a hybrid sensor and a neural network to detect tremor during unconstrained activities Overall mean specificity of 90.2% and sensitivity of 92.9% for tremor detection
Tzallas et al. [39] 2014 4 triaxial accelerometers and 1 gyroscope on both wrists, ankles, and the waist 20 PD patients for short-term analysis and 24 for long-term analysis Machine learning The authors propose a system for continuous evaluation of tremor and motor symptoms Accuracy of 87% for tremor classification
Ahlrichs et al. [40] 2014 Triaxial accelerometer located on the wrist 76 subjects (64 PD for testing and 12 PD for training) Machine learning: Support vector machines The results indicate that frequency domain features may be enough to detect tremor Specificity of 88.4% and sensitivity of 89.4%
Kostikis et al. [57] 2015 Smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope, located on the wrists with a glove 25 PD patients and 20 age-matched healthy controls Machine learning The authors propose the use of consumer smartphones to assess tremor Accuracy of 82% for PD patients and 90% for healthy controls
Braybrook et al. [43] 2016 A triaxial accelerometer located on the wrist of the most affected side 85 PD patients Threshold method using a spectral analysis The authors propose a system for ambulatory assessment of PD tremor Specificity of 92.5% and selectivity of 92.9% for tremor detection
García-Magariño et al. [45] 2016 Smartphone with triaxial accelerometer used in unconstrained environments 11 PD with tremors 10 subjects without tremor Algorithmic approach The authors propose a smartphone-based application for detecting hand tremor Specificity of 95.8% and Sensitivity of 99.5% for tremor detection
Jeon et al. [46] 2017 A watch-like device with an accelerometer and gyroscope located on the wrist and finger of both hands 85 PD patients Machine learning: Several algorithms The authors show an accurate scoring system for estimating the tremor severity Accuracy of 85.5%, and an RMSE of 0.410 (on five classes according to UPDRS)
Pulliam et al. [47] 2018 Triaxial accelerometer and gyroscope located on both wrists and ankles 13 PD patients Regression models The use of wearable sensors to quantify the dose–response for several symptoms AUC 0.89 for tremor detection.
Kim et al. [50] 2018 Triaxial accelerometer and gyroscope located on the wrist and finger of both hands 92 PD patients Deep learning: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) The use of CNN outperforms machine learning approaches Accuracy of 0.85, and RMSE of 0.35
López-Blanco et al. [51] 2019 Consumer smartwatch (accelerometer and gyroscope) 22 PD patients The tremor intensity calculated through RMS of the gyroscope signal The use of consumer smartwatches for tremor quantification is reliable and well-correlated with clinical scores. Spearman coefficient between UPDRS scores and smartwatch measurements for the intensity of 0.81 (p < 0.001)
Hssayeni et al. [15] 2019 Triaxial gyroscope located on the wrist and ankle of the most-affected side 24 PD patients Machine and deep learning: Recurrent neural networks The authors propose the use of gradient tree boosting and Long short-term memory networks A correlation r = 0.93 with LOSO using gradient tree boosting algorithm
Pierleoni et al. [52] 2019 Watch like device with a triaxial accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer 40 PD patients Threshold method A method for continuous and real-time monitoring of PD using wearables and Cloud services Accuracy of 97.7% for tremor detection
Battista et al. [53] 2020 Watch-like device with a triaxial accelerometer 20 PD patients Threshold method A device for continuous monitoring of PD tremor, increasing the discrimination with normal daily activities Linear correlation with the UPDRS constancy r = 0.744 (p = 0.0004)
Van Brummelen et al. [54] 2020 Consumer devices with triaxial accelerometers 10 patients with PD and 10 with essential tremor Spectral analysis The authors evaluate the performance of the accelerometers of consumer devices. Consumer devices could be suitable to analyze the peak frequency in PD tremor
Mahadevan et al. [55] 2020 Watch-like IMU (results reported with the use of the accelerometer) 31 PD and 50 healthy controls for evaluating the tremor detector Threshold method and machine learning Sensor measures of resting tremor present high agreement with clinical scoring Tremor classifier accuracy of 83%. Pearson correlation of 0.97 for tremor constancy
San Segundo et al. [56] 2020 Wrist-worn triaxial accelerometers 12 patients with PD Deep learning: Convolutional neural networks Evaluation of novel preprocessing methods and algorithms in free-living and laboratory settings Error lower than 5% when estimating the percentage of tremor in a laboratory setting