Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 26;18(1):107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010107

Table 2.

General Characteristics of Participants of the two groups.

Characteristics Simulation Using SP * (n = 29) PRP * (n = 33) χ2/t p
M ± SD or n(%) M ± SD or n(%)
Age 21.41 ± 1.05 21.70 ± 1.45 −0.642* 0.521
Gender Female 24(82.8) 26(78.8) 0.156* 0.693
Male 5(17.2) 7(21.2)
Average Grade Point <3.5 13(44.8) 13(39.4) 0.187* 0.665
≥3.5 16(55.2) 20(60.6)
Simulation experiences Yes 23(79.3) 20(60.6) 2.541* 0.111
No 6(20.7) 13(39.4)
Number of simulation experience One 2(8.7) 4(20.0) 1.326 a 0.479
Two 4(17.4) 4(20.0)
Three 17(73.9) 12(60.0)
Standard precaution education experiences Yes 22(75.9) 24(72.7) 0.079* 0.778
No 7(24.1) 9(27.3)
Educational experience of standard precautions Lecture 7(31.8) 13(54.2) 2.384 a 0.251
Lecture with Practice 14(63.6) 10(41.7)
Simulation 1(4.5) 1(4.2)

* SP: standardized patient, PRP: peer role-play, a: Fisher’s exact test.