Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;13(1):136. doi: 10.3390/polym13010136

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of polysaccharide extraction techniques.

Extraction Techniques Advantages Disadvantages References
Conventional water extraction
  • Simple and low-cost equipment

  • Ease of operation

  • Limited yield and selectivity

  • Long extraction time

  • High energy consumption

  • Lack of automation

[24,36,37,38]
Pressurized liquid assisted extraction
  • Selective solubilization by modulating operation severity

  • Shorter extraction time

  • Equipment costs

  • Degradation of thermolabile compounds

  • Hydrolysis of polymers

[53,54,55,56,57]
Ultrasonic assisted extraction
  • Low cost

  • Reduction of extraction time

  • Low solvent consumption

  • Reproducibility and scalability

  • Possibility to scale up to industry requirements

  • Noise pollution

  • Lack of uniformity in the vessel

  • Uneven heating in the vessel

  • Long-term ultrasonication possibly inducing structural changes

[58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]
Ionic liquid extraction
  • High extraction efficiency

  • ‘Green’ solvents

  • Negligible emulsion formation

  • Minimal viscosity

  • Fast phase separation

  • High cost factor

  • Very high corrosiveness

  • Highly hygroscopic

[66,67,68,69,70]
Microwave assisted extraction
  • High extraction efficiency

  • Short extraction time

  • Low energy consumption

  • Degradation of thermolabile compounds

[45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]
Enzymatic assisted extraction
  • High specificity

  • High catalytic efficiency

  • Mild reaction conditions

  • Low energy consumption

  • Food-grade enzymes

  • Limited enzyme recycling

  • Enzyme costs

  • Availability of suitable enzymes

[71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]