Table 2.
Authors | Year | Stage Enrollment † | Phase | Group | n | Primary Endpoint | p Value | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pouliquen [15] | 1987–1992 | II–IV | III | Surgery alone | 68 | OS *: 14 | N.S. | CF followed by surgery is not useful. |
Preoperative CT (CF) | 52 | OS *: 13 | ||||||
Ancona [16] | 1992–1997 | II/III | III | Surgery alone | 47 | 5-year OS: 22% | N.S. | OS was improved only in the patients with pCR. |
Surgery + postoperative CT (CF) | 47 | 5-year OS: 34% | ||||||
Kelsen [17] | 1990–1995 | I/II/III | III | Surgery + postoperative CT (CF) | 100 | OS *: 16.1 | N.S. | Preoperative chemotherapy with CF did not improve OS. |
(RTOG trial) | (AC: 53%) | Surgery + pre and postoperative CT (CF) | 105 | OS *: 14.9 | ||||
Working group ‡ [19] | 1992–1998 | I/II/III | III | Surgery alone | 402 | OS *: 13.3 | <0.01 | Preoperative CT improved survival. |
(MRC trial) | (AC: 67%) | Surgery + preoperative CT (CF) | 400 | OS *: 16.8 | ||||
Shapiro [21] | 2000–2004 | I/II/III | III | Surgery alone | 188 | OS *: 81.6 | <0.01 | Preoperative CRT was effective. |
(AC: 75%) | Preoperative CRT | 180 | OS *: 21.1 | |||||
Sjoquist [22] | meta-analysis | Surgery alone | 952 | OS | Strong evidence for a benefit of preoperative CRT. | |||
Preoperative CRT | 980 | HR: 0.78 (0.70–0.88) § | ||||||
Preoperative CT | 1141 | OS | Advantage of preoperative CRT was unclear. | |||||
Preoperative CRT | 1079 | HR: 0.88 (0.76–1.01) § | ||||||
Klevebro [25] | 2006–2013 | I/II/III | III | Preoperative CT | 91 | pCR rate: 9% | <0.01 | Preoperative CRT had higher pCR rate. |
(AC: 72%) | Preoperative CRT | 90 | pCR rate: 28% |
ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; CT, chemotherapy; CF, cisplatin plus 5-FU; OS, overall survival; N.S., not significant; pCR, pathological complete response; AC, adenocarcinoma; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; † UICC at the time; * median, month; ‡ Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Party; § 95% confidence interval.