Table 5.
Meta-analysis | |||||||
Prognostic factor | OR (95% CI) | Overall quality | |||||
Hispanic race | 0.92 (0.68–1.25) | 5 (+++) | |||||
Narrative Synthesis | |||||||
Prognostic factor | Univariate | Multivariate | Overall quality | ||||
+ | 0 | - | + | 0 | - | ||
Age (continuous variable) | |||||||
Age | 3 | 1 | - | 4 | 3 | - | 5 (+++) |
Sex | |||||||
Female sex | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | 4 | 5 (+++) |
Male sex | 2 | 2 | - | 8 | - | - | 6 (++++) |
Race | |||||||
Black (reference = white or non-Black) | 1 | 1 | - | 4 | 3 | - | 4 (+++) |
Hispanic (reference = white or non-Hispanic) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 (+) |
Asian (reference = white) | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | 2 | 4 (+++) |
Native Hawaiian (reference = white) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 3 (++) |
American Indian (reference = white) | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | 4 (+++) |
White | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 2 (+) |
Indian (reference = Chinese) | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 (+) |
Malay (reference = Chinese) | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 (+) |
Biracial (Workman) or mixed race (Ali) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 5 (+++) |
Minority ethnicity | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 2 (+) |
Other (Tang = Chinese; otherwise = white) | - | 1 | - | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 (++) |
Missing | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 3 | 3 (++) |
Race (combined analysis – i.e., racial difference exists between readmitted and non-readmitted cohorts) | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 4 (+++) |
Socioeconomic | |||||||
Decreasing incoming | - | - | - | 3 | 1 | - | 5 (+++) |
Low socioeconomic status | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 4 (+++) |
Insurance status | |||||||
Medicare (reference category = private insurance or non-Medicare) | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | 4 (+++) |
Medicaid (reference category = private insurance) | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | 3 (++) |
Self-pay, no charge, workers’ compensation, or other (reference category = private insurance) | - | - | - | - | 2 | 3 | 2 (+) |
Disability entitlement | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 3 (++) |
Functional status, living situation, and frailty | |||||||
Dependent functional status | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 4 (+++) |
Use of walking aids | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 4 (+++) |
Living alone | - | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | 5 (+++) |
Living in an institution or nursing home | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 3 (++) |
Homeless | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 2 (+) |
Frailty (Modified Frailty Index) | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 5 (+++) |
Overall quality: + very low quality = very little confidence in the effect estimate: true effect likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect; ++ low quality = confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the study; +++ moderate quality = moderately confident in the effect estimate: true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different; ++++ high quality = very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.