Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;10(1):108. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010108

Table 4.

Efficacy Comparison by treatment group at each assessment periods.

Variable Value p-Value 1
Placebo (n = 18) Treatment (n = 16)
Height (cm) 1.03 cm/3 month 1.43 cm/3 month
Screening 126.93 ± 7.05 121.43 ± 7.89 0.0394 2
Visit 1 127.38 ± 7.10 121.60 ± 7.98 0.0326 2
Visit 2 127.88 ± 7.03 122.25 ± 8.18 0.0386 2
Visit 3 128.41 ± 7.06 123.03 ± 7.84 0.0430 2
Change from baseline 1.03 ± 0.51 1.43 ± 0.68 0.0639 2
IGF-1 0.27 9.57
Screening 69.85 ± 16.36 64.95 ± 20.85 0.3496 3
Visit 3 70.12 ± 19.94 74.52 ± 19.38 0.3162 3
Change from baseline 0.26 ± 13.69 9.57 ± 12.69 0.0488 2
Osteocalcin
Screening 66.80 ± 27.59 75.96 ± 30.49 0.3003 3
Visit 3 58.72 ± 27.56 89.44 ± 19.92 0.0058 3
Change from baseline −8.08 ± 18.33 13.48 ± 25.12 0.0070 2

1p-values were adjusted for observed value at baseline by using baseline value as covariate in analysis of covariance. Baseline value (screening or visit 1) was adjusted in ANCOVA analysis. 2p-values were derived from independent t-test. 3p-values were derived from Mann-Whitney’s U test. Shapiro-Wilk’s test was employed for test of normality assumption.