Table A17.
Emospace widget response multinomial logistic regression model for conscientiousness concerning the space of a widget as clusters.
Odds Ratio | SE | CI | t | p | Response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.98 | 0.02 | [0.95, 1.02] | −1.09 | 0.275 | A |
0.92 | 0.03 | [0.86, 0.97] | −2.95 | 0.003 | B |
0.98 | 0.03 | [0.91, 1.04] | −0.70 | 0.484 | C |
0.96 | 0.02 | [0.91, 1.01] | −1.70 | 0.090 | D |
0.93 | 0.02 | [0.89, 0.97] | −3.64 | <0.001 | E |
1.01 | 0.02 | [0.97, 1.04] | 0.34 | 0.735 | F |
1.02 | 0.02 | [0.98, 1.06] | 0.92 | 0.356 | G |
0.96 | 0.02 | [0.91, 1.01] | −1.61 | 0.108 | H |
0.96 | 0.03 | [0.92, 1.00] | −2.06 | 0.039 | I |
1.00 | 0.03 | [0.97, 1.03] | −0.14 | 0.887 | J |
1.01 | 0.02 | [0.96, 1.05] | 0.30 | 0.766 | K |
0.97 | 0.02 | [0.92, 1.02] | −1.36 | 0.173 | L |
1.09 | 0.03 | [1.04, 1.15] | 3.35 | 0.001 | M |
1.08 | 0.02 | [1.03, 1.13] | 3.13 | 0.002 | N |
1.97 | 0.04 | [0.90, 1.03] | −0.98 | 0.326 | O |
1.14 | 0.03 | [1.08, 1.21] | 4.51 | <0.001 | P |
Deviance | 53,124.38 |