Table 4.

Regression results of situational strength characteristics to explain burnout.

	Salespeople			Office Employees			Teachers
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Intercept	1.44 ***	1.51 ***	1.44 ***	1.75 ***	1.94 ***	1.94	1.71 ***	1.77 ***	1.78 ***
Clarity	−0.17 *	−0.29	−0.26	−0.41 ***	−0.44 ***	−0.43 ***	−0.26 *	−0.25 *	−0.24 *
Consistency	−0.33 *	−0.27	−0.32 *	−0.20	−0.19	−0.18	−0.06	−0.09	−0.08
Constraints	0.01	−0.07	0.01	0.16 *	0.14 *	0.10	0.30 ***	0.34 ***	0.37 ***
Consequences	−0.01	0.05	0.06	−0.05	−0.08	−0.08	−0.11	−0.12	−0.11
Clarity × Consistency		0.06	0.17		−0.16 **	−0.14 *		−0.01	−0.02
Clarity × Constraints		0.11	0.04		0.06	−0.08		−0.08	−0.08
Clarity × Consequences		−0.09	−0.11		−0.03	−0.02		0.10	0.08
Consistency × Constraints		0.07	0.12		−0.02	−0.02		0.07	0.07
Consistency × Consequences		−0.13	−0.09		0.00	−0.01		0.03	0.04
Constraints × Consequences		−0.04	−0.06		−0.11 *	−0.12 *		−0.14 *	−0.14 *
Clarity × Consistency × Constraints			−0.08 *			0.04			−0.02
R2	0.27	0.30	0.33	0.13	0.19	0.20	0.17	0.22	0.23
ΔR2		0.03	0.03 *		0.06 *	0.01		0.05 *	0.01

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.