Table 1.
Characteristic | Participants number (%) |
---|---|
Gender | |
Female | 187 (93.0) |
Male | 14 (7.0) |
Age | |
Age (mean, SD) | 45.2 (13.5) |
Did not answer (#, %) | 2 (1.0) |
Race/ethnicity | |
African American | 123 (62.1) |
White | 66 (33.3) |
Other | 9 (7.5) |
Did not answer | 3 (1.5) |
Hispanic or Latino | |
Yes Hispanic/Latino | 9 (4.5) |
Did not answer | 2 (4.0) |
Education | |
High school or less | 74 (36.8) |
Some college | 50 (24.9) |
College graduate | 40 (19.9) |
More than college | 37 (18.4) |
Did not answer | 2 (1.0) |
Government assistance | |
Yes | 124 (62.6) |
No | 74 (37.4) |
Did not answer | 3 (1.5) |
Annual household income | |
Less than $10,000 | 38 (18.9) |
$10,000–29,999 | 58 (28.9) |
$30,000–49,999 | 41 (20.4) |
$50,000 or more | 44 (21.9) |
Did not answer | 20 (10.0) |
F&V intake (cups/day) | |
Daily F&V (mean, SD) | 3.41 (1.3) |
GIS-based measures (mean, SD) | |
Convenience stores 1 mile (mean, SD) | 2.67 (3.0) |
Grocery stores 1 mile (mean, SD) | 0.62 (1.2) |
Supermarket 1 mile (mean, SD) | 0.42 (0.64) |
Supercenter 1 mile (mean, SD) | 0.23 (0.19) |
Neighborhood perceived access measures | |
Convenience (n = 165) | |
Yes convenient | 133 (19.4) |
No/neutral convenient | 32 (80.6) |
Variety (n = 165) | |
Yes high variety | 107 (64.6) |
No/neutral high variety | 58 (35.2) |
Quality (n = 165) | |
Yes high quality | 91 (55.2) |
No/neutral high quality | 74 (44.6) |
F&V fruit and vegetable; GIS geographic information systems; SD standard deviation.