Table 2.
Item | Description | Quantitative | Qualitative | Psychological | Social | R 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative | ||||||
1 | Small | 0.82* (0.07) | 0.68 | |||
2 | Ache | 0.98* (0.06) | 0.96 | |||
3 | Hungry | 0.93* (0.07) | 0.86 | |||
Qualitative | ||||||
4 | Important | 0.91* (0.05) | 0.83 | |||
5 | Prefer | 0.85* (0.05) | 0.73 | |||
6 | Canned | 0.73* (0.09) | 0.53 | |||
7 | Same | 0.92* (0.05) | 0.84 | |||
8 | No meat | 0.74* (0.08) | 0.54 | |||
9 | Unsafe | 0.72* (0.13) | 0.52 | |||
Psychological | ||||||
10 | Current | 0.97* (0.02) | 0.93 | |||
11 | Future | 0.98* (0.02) | 0.96 | |||
12 | Anxious | 0.98* (0.02) | 0.95 | |||
Social | ||||||
13 | Control | 0.87* (0.11) | 0.76 | |||
14 | Fair | 0.68* (0.11) | 0.46 | |||
15 | Shame | 0.92*(0.05) | 0.84 | |||
16 | Different | 0.96* (0.04) | 0.92 |
Factor loadings and standard errors were from the confirmatory factor analysis. There were four factors representing the four domains of food insecurity: quantitative, qualitative, psychological, and social. Indicators represent the 16 items included in the 4D-FIS. A factor loading with a magnitude > 0.7 is considered high [40]. The variance is shown in column labeled R2.
*p < .05.