Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(1):219–231. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09912-z

Table 3.

Workforce reintegration, return-to-work interruption, and reinjury, as reported by Washington State workers surveyed about a year after workers’ compensation claim closure with a permanent partial disability (PPD) award; crude odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing response patterns for workers with a higher degree of whole body impairment (≥10% WBI) to those with a lower degree of impairment (WBI <10%)

Survey question N Overall (N=598) WBI <10% (N=464) WBI ≥10% (N=134) Crude OR (95% CI)

n (%) n (%) n (%)
Working for pay when interviewed 589
 Currently working 516 (87.6) 402 (87.6) 114 (87.7) 1.01
 Not currently working 73 (12.4) 57 (12.4) 16 (12.3) (0.56, 1.83)
Current/most recent employment type 590
 Full-time traditional 487 (82.5) 381 (83.2) 106 (80.3) 0.82
 Part-time, temporary, seasonal, or self-employed 103 (17.5) 77 (16.8) 26 (19.7) (0.50, 1.35)
Union membership 588
 Currently a union member 250 (42.5) 191 (41.9) 59 (44.7) 1.12
 Not currently a union member 338 (57.5) 265 (58.1) 73 (55.3) (0.76, 1.66)
Industry sector now versus when injureda 588
 Industry sector now different than when injured 258 (43.9) 201 (44.1) 57 (43.2) 0.96
 Industry sector not different 330 (56.1) 255 (55.9) 75 (56.8) (0.65, 1.43)
Occupation now versus when injured 588
 Occupation now different than when injured 177 (30.1) 126 (27.5) 51 (39.2) 1.70
 Occupation not different 411 (69.9) 332 (72.5) 79 (60.8) (1.13, 2.56)
Employer for initial RTW versus when injured 591
 Initial RTW with different employer 166 (28.1) 121 (26.4) 45 (34.1) 1.44
 Initial RTW with same employer 425 (71.9) 338 (73.6) 87 (65.9) (0.95, 2.19)
New work injuriesb since claim closure 590
 One or more new work injuries 79 (13.4) 60 (13.1) 19 (14.5) 1.13
 No new work injuries 511 (86.6) 399 (86.9) 112 (85.5) (0.65, 1.97)
Risk of being reinjured at work due to impairment 569
 At higher risk now compared to before injury 371 (65.2) 285 (64.2) 86 (68.8) 1.23
 Not at higher risk now compared to before injury 198 (34.8) 159 (35.8) 39 (31.2) (0.80, 1.88)
Risk of being reinjured at work due to impairment 561
 At higher risk compared to others doing same job 305 (54.4) 236 (53.9) 69 (56.1) 1.09
 Not at higher risk compared to others doing same job 256 (45.6) 202 (46.1) 54 (43.9) (0.73, 1.64)
Risk of losing current job due to impairment 500c
 At higher risk due to impairment 102 (20.4) 72 (18.5) 30 (27.3) 1.66
 Not at higher risk due to impairment 398 (79.6) 318 (81.5) 80 (72.7) (1.01, 2.71)
Will be working in 6 months 567
 Certain 456 (80.4) 355 (80.7) 101 (79.5) 0.93
 Uncertain 111 (19.6) 85 (19.3) 26 (20.5) (0.57, 1.52)

RTW, returned to work; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PPD, permanent partial disability; WBI, whole body impairment.

a

Survey response for industry sector was compared to administrative workers’ compensation data for industry sector when injured.

b

For this question, qualifying work injuries were defined as those resulting in at least one missed day from work.

c

Queried only if currently working.

Note: In each unadjusted logistic regression model, the independent variable was WBI percentage, comparing responses for workers with higher WBI to those with lower WBI (the reference category). ORs are shown on the row containing the response that was coded as 1; CIs are shown on the row containing the response that was coded as 0. Column percentages do not always sum to exactly 100% due to rounding.