Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;49(1):584–594. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1199

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Csy-AcrIF4 (EMD-22582, PDB 7JZW) Csy-AcrIF7 (EMD-22583, PDB 7JZX) Csy-AcrIF14 (EMD-22585, PDB 7JZZ)
Data collection and processing
Magnification 81 000 81 000 81 000
Voltage (kV) 300 300 300
Electron exposure (e2) 54 54 54
Defocus range (μm) 1.5–2.5 1.5–2.5 1.5–2.5
Pixel size (Å) 1.05 1.05 1.05
Symmetry imposed C1 C1 C1
Initial particle images (no.) 1 765,062 1 627 883 1 217 862
Final particle images (no.) 766 782 502 177 226 089
Map resolution (Å) 3.2 3.4 3.2
FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3–4.2 3.2–4.4 3–4.2
Refinement
Initial model used PDB 6NE0 PDB 7JZW PDB 7JZW
Model resolution (Å) 3.2 3.4 3.2
FSC threshold 0.5 0.5 0.5
Model resolution range (Å) 3.2–50 3.4–50 3.2–50
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) –112 –129 –86
Model composition
Non-hydrogen atoms 24 266 23 948 24 767
Protein residues 2986 2954 3092
Nucleotides 61 61 61
Ligands 0 0 0
B factors (Å2)
Protein 28.49 65.26 48.40
Nucleotide 58.01 75.10 81.07
R.m.s. deviations
Bond lengths (Å) 0.010 0.009 0.010
Bond angles (°) 0.977 0.921 0.980
Validation
MolProbity score 1.75 1.73 1.76
Clashscore 5.65 5.33 5.72
Poor rotamers (%) 0.13 0.40 0.00
Ramachandran plot
Favored (%) 93.00 92.99 93.07
Allowed (%) 7.00 7.01 6.93
Disallowed (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00