Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 9;21:36. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01992-z

Table 2.

Comparison of the participants’ cognitive performance and functional status between the two groups

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (n = 33) Mild cognitive impairmenta (n = 44) P value
Executive function
 TMT-A (s) 30.0 ± 16.3 21.9 ± 16.2 0.034
 TMT-B (s) 75.2 ± 39.1 59.0 ± 34.6 0.043
 Category fluency test 10.8 ± 3.3 13.4 ± 3.9 0.003
Attention and working memory
 Digit recall forwards 7.2 ± 1.4 7.3 ± 1.6 0.764
 Digit recall backwards 3.5 ± 1.1 4.3 ± 1.7 0.016
Episode memory
 California Verbal Learning Test-short form 17.6 ± 5.0 20.1 ± 5.2 0.030
Visuospatial performance
 Judgment of Line Orientation 13.2 ± 4.1 13.8 ± 3.2 0.522
Language
 Boston Naming Test 20.9 ± 5.3 23.6 ± 4.9 0.027
Depression
 Geriatric Depression Scale-15 3.9 ± 3.7 2.1 ± 2.6 0.028
Physical function
 Barthel Index 96.1 ± 10.8 99.9 ± 0.8 0.057
 IADL 20.7 ± 5.3 22.3 ± 3.9 0.150
 Tinetti gait 10.9 ± 2.0 11.9 ± 0.6 0.010
 Tinetti balance 14.2 ± 3.4 15.6 ± 1.1 0.028
 Timed Up and Go test (s) 22.7 ± 13.4 13.4 ± 3.1 < 0.001

Abbreviations: TMT Trail Making Test, IADL Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

aAll participants in the MCI group did not have slow gait speed [1 standard deviation (SD) below the mean age- and sex-specific gait speed]