Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;23:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.007

Table 2.

Registries by failure modes (%). N, qualified for revision surgery. *First number is overall revision percentage, second number is early revision (<3 months from primary procedure) percentage.

Registry N Aseptic Loosening Wear; lysis Instability Infection Arthro-fibrosis, stiffness Patello-femoral or extensor mechanisma Peri-prosthetic fracture Mal-alignment Pain otherb
Norway38 8147 20 2.8 14.9 16.2 3.8 3 6.7 24.7
Sweden37 4685 28 5 15 30 13 3 6
Germany47 13378 25 5.7; 1.1 8.9 14.7 4 4.2 3 1.8 31.6
Switzerland48 8340 34.5 5.8 15.9 17 4.9 25.7 2.8 10.4 12.7 11.7
United Kingdom49 60294 37 12.9 15.9 15.7 5.4 12.1 3.8 6.9 14.7 14.6
Australia50 24722 25 3.9 8.1 23.3 3.6 15.5 3 2.2 8.2 7.3
New Zealand51 3652 35.9 26.6 25.1 3 29.4
United States52 49491 25/2.8* 2.9/0.3* 12.6/6.7* 20.5/63* 2.3/3.9* 37/23*
Japan53 1679 44.4 12 13.5 32 3 2.2 16.8

The three most common reasons are in bold.

a

Includes patellar dislocation, resurfacing due to progression of osteoarthritis, erosion, failure, and patellar pain.

b

Includes incorrect sizing, metal sensitivity, implant breakage, and other or missing reasons.