Table 2.
Costs of urea and maize prices in East African countries and implication for economic return, i.e. value–cost ratios The costs of urea increase, whereas the prices of maize grain and the value–cost ratios decrease, with the distance to markets (adapted from Guo et al. (2009) who used an application rate of 35 kg N ha–1)
| Country | Farm-gate urea costsA | Farm-gate maize pricesB | Value–cost ratio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (USD t–1) | |||||||||
| Market access | |||||||||
| High | Medium | Low | High | Medium | Low | High | Medium | Low | |
| Burundi | 659 | 684 | 693 | 234 | 200 | 185 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Kenya | 458 | 486 | 522 | 288 | 238 | 182 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 1.50 |
| Rwanda | 647 | 675 | 699 | 236 | 209 | 178 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Tanzania | 526 | 552 | 622 | 245 | 214 | 128 | 3.25 | 2.75 | 1.25 |
| Uganda | 553 | 577 | 613 | 244 | 202 | 168 | 3.00 | 2.10 | 1.75 |
AAverage costs in 2005. BAverage prices in 2008.