Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec;12(12):7429–7441. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1743

Table 3. The difference between severe and non-severe patients in treatments and prognosis.

Treatment and prognosis Included studies No. (events/total) Heterogeneity* OR 95% CI P valuea
Severe Non-severe
Use of corticosteroid 9 379/621 353/2,009 P<0.00001; I2=92% 5.08 2.16–11.98 0.0002
Antiviral therapy 6 311/455 869/1,706 P=0.99; I2=0% 1.71 1.35–2.18 <0.0001
Antibiotic therapy 5 390/463 839/1,581 P<0.0001; I2=85% 5.56 2.00–15.94 0.001
Antifungal drugs 3 39/348 19/1,336 P=0.07; I2=62% 9.29 2.12–40.80 0.003
Intravenous immune globulin 5 229/408 180/1,432 P<0.00001; I2=92% 7.34 2.29–23.53 0.0008
Traditional Chinese medicine 2 48/123 110/292 P=0.98; I2=0% 1.15 0.59–2.25 0.68
Mechanical ventilation
   Invasive 8 229/578 1/1,998 P=0.02; I2=56% 213.88 44.06–1,038.32 <0.00001
   Non-invasive 7 262/520 128/1,758 P<0.00001 I2=83% 57.45 11.61–284.38 <0.00001
ECMO 7 37/538 0/1,903 P=0.99; I2=0% 32.58 10.61–100.02 <0.0001
CKRT 5 28/313 3/1,209 P=0.57; I2=0% 14.99 5.60–40.14 <0.00001
Prognosis
   Discharge 7 164/537 871/2,054 P<0.00001; I2=87% 0.20 0.08–0.53 0.001
   Mortality 7 64/490 8/1,959 P=0.88; I2=0% 25.85 13.12–50.94 <0.00001
   Hospitalization 7 310/537 1169/2,054 P<0.00001; I2=93% 2.40 0.62–9.27 0.20

*, heterogeneity: I2< 50%, P>0.1, suggesting that the homogeneity of each test was good, and the meta-analysis was performed using the fixed effect model (FE), while in contrast (I2>50%, P<0.1), the random effects model (RE) was used; a, P values indicate differences between severe and non-severe patients. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; CKRT, continuous kidney replacement therapy.