Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 2;2021:6644071. doi: 10.1155/2021/6644071

Table 4.

Comparative segmentation results of the proposed model against the state of the art on EX and SE.

EX SE
Methods SEN IOU Dice SEN IOU DICE
Dai et al. 0.8074 0.7843 0.8791 0.7006 0.7071 0.8284
Zhang et al. 0.8418 0.8137 0.8973 0.7523 0.7505 0.8575
Van Grinsven et al. 0.8031 0.7749 0.8732 0.6988 0.692 0.818
M-Net 0.8327 0.8083 0.894 0.7297 0.7156 0.8343
FC-DenseNet 0.8414 0.8099 0.8949 0.7554 0.7623 0.8651
Sambyal et al. 0.8421 0.8183 0.9001 0.7563 0.763 0.8656
FFU-Net 0.8755 0.8414 0.9138 0.7933 0.7876 0.8812
U-Net 0.7819 0.7602 0.8638 0.6713 0.6707 0.8029