Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 5;28(2):1167–1177. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08926-4

Table 2.

Relationship between mismatch repair status and clinicopathologic features in the 66 stage II small bowel adenocarcinomas

MMR-d MMR-p P value
Number of cases (%) 28 (42) 38 (58)
Age at SBA diagnosis, years, mean ± SD 60.1 ± 16.7 61.7 ± 12.9 0.659
Sex, N (%) 0.797
 Female 11 (39) 13 (34)
 Male 17 (61) 25 (66)
Predisposing condition, N (%) < 0.001
 Celiac disease 16 (57) 5 (13)
 Crohn’s disease 3 (11) 17 (45)
 Lynch syndromea 7 (25) 0 (0)
 None (sporadic) 2 (7) 16 (42)
Site, N (%) 1.000
 Duodenum 2 (7) 3 (8)
 Jejunum/ileum 26 (93) 35 (92)
T level, N (%) 0.576
 T3 22 (79) 27 (71)
 T4 6 (21) 11 (29)
R status, N (%) 0.035
 R0 28 (100) 32 (84)
 R1 0 (0) 6 (16)
Adequate number of LN, N (%) 1.000
 Yes 16 (57) 21 (55)
 No 12 (43) 17 (45)
Any high-risk features, N (%) 0.609
 No 12 (43) 13 (34)
 Yes 16 (57) 25 (66)
Vascular or perineural invasion, N (%) 0.456
 No 15 (54) 16 (42)
 Yes 13 (46) 22 (58)
Histologic grade, N (%) 0.300
 Low (G1–G2) 16 (57) 27 (71)
 High (G3) 12 (43) 11 (29)
Any extended high-risk features, N (%) 0.555
 No 7 (25) 7 (18)
 Yes 21 (75) 31 (82)
Histologic subtype, N (%) < 0.001
 Medullary 5 (18) 0 (0)
 Glandular 23 (82) 26 (68)
 Diffuse 0 (0) 6 (16)
 Mixed 0 (0) 6 (16)
Histologic subtype group, N (%) 0.001
 Cohesive 28 (100) 26 (68)
 Non-cohesive 0 12 (32)

LN lymph nodes; MMR-d mismatch repair deficient; MMR-p mismatch repair proficient; SBA small bowel adenocarcinoma; SD standard deviation

aIncluding 1 genetically confirmed Lynch syndrome patient and 6 cases strongly suspected for Lynch syndrome due to their histomolecular profiles