Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 11;11:395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79880-0

Table 2.

Characteristics of the benign and malignant breast lesions in the development cohort.

Characteristic Benign
(n = 256)
Malignant
(n = 43)
Univariable odds ratio (95% CI) Univariable P value
Age (y) 44 ± 11 (19–78) 54 ± 13 (22–81) 1.1 (1.0, 1.1)  < .001
Size on US (cm) 1.1 ± 0.5 (0.4–3.2) 1.3 ± 0.9 (0.4–3.2) 1.5 (0.9, 2.4) .124
Radiologist’s BI-RADS assessment
3 83 (32.4) 1 (2.3) Reference
 ≥ 4A 173 (67.6) 42 (97.7) 20.2 (2.7, 148.9) .003
Quantitative morphology scores from the DL-CAD software
Characteristic
Descriptor
Shape
Round 0.01 (0, 0.05) 0.01 (0, 0.08) 0.6 (0, 11.3) .734
Oval 0.77 (0.36, 0.93) 0.15 (0.05, 0.51) 0.04 (0.01, 0.14)  < .001
Irregular 0.12 (0.03, 0.49) 0.82 (0.44, 0.92) 18.6 (6.3, 54.8)  < .001
Orientation
Parallel 0.99 (0.95, 0.99) 0.72 (0.24, 0.96) 0.03 (0.01, 0.1)  < .001
Not parallel 0.01 (0, 0.05) 0.28 (0.05, 0.76) 30.9 (9.4, 101.0)  < .001
Margin
Circumscribed 0.98 (0.41, 0.99) 0.11 (0, 0.84) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)  < .001
Indistinct 0 (0, 0.05) 0.02 (0, 0.46) 2.3 (0.8, 6.6) .107
Spiculated 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0.01) 9.6 (1.2, 80.9) .037
Angular 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 1.2 (0.04, 38.9) .902
Microlobulated 0.01 (0, 0.07) 0.16 (0.01, 0.72) 6.5 (2.4, 17.5)  < .001
Posterior features
No 0.44 (0.18, 0.71) 0.58 (0.20, 0.78) 2.1 (0.7, 6.3) .195
Enhancement 0.38 (0.12, 0.72) 0.14 (0.01, 0.30) 0.1 (0.03, 0.4)  < .001
Shadowing 0 (0, 0.01) 0.01 (0, 0.32) 4.1 (1.4, 12.3) .011
Combined 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0.02) 2.0 (0.3, 13.4) .465
Echo pattern
Anechoic 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 1.1 (0.9, 1.2) .281
Hyperechoic 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 3.9 (0, 836.3) .618
Complex 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 0.4 (0, 37.2) .671
Hypoechoic 0.84 (0.19, 0.98) 0.91 (0.28, 0.99) 1.7 (0.7, 4.2) .292
Isoechoic 0.05 (0, 0.46) 0.01 (0, 0.29) 0.6 (0.2, 1.7) .312
Heterogeneous 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0.03) 2.7 (0.6, 12.9) .213

BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, CI, confidence interval, DL-CAD, deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis.

Data for the age and size are expressed in terms of the mean ± standard deviation (ranges). Data for the BI-RADS final assessment are presented as numbers (percentages). Data for quantitative morphologic scores from the DL-CAD software are presented as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile).