Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;84(1):46–54. doi: 10.4046/trd.2020.0021

Table 5.

Correct use ratio at each step with five types of inhaler device

Evohaler (n=75) Respimat (n=46) Turbuhaler (n=45) Ellipta (n=74) Breezhaler/Handihaler (n=80) p-value
Assembling
  1st visit 48 (64) 42 (91.3) 32 (71.1) 74 (100) 80 (100) <0.001
2nd visit 48 (77.4) 37 (97.4) 37 (97.4) 62 (95.4) 73 (97.3) <0.001
Holding the inhaler correctly
1st visit 71 (94.7) 41 (89.1) 45 (100) 67 (90.5) 75 (93.8) 0.166
2nd visit 59 (95.2) 37 (97.4) 37 (97.4) 61 (93.8) 66 (88.0) 0.313
Breathing out fully
1st visit 24 (32) 24 (52.2) 14 (31.1) 25 (33.8) 23 (28.8) 0.105
2nd visit 35 (56.5) 17 (44.7) 16 (42.1) 25 (38.5) 30 (40.0) 0.267
Inhalation
1st visit 36 (48.0) 28 (60.9) 42 (93.3) 61 (82.4) 66 (82.5) <0.001
2nd visit 42 (67.7) 33 (86.8) 34 (89.5) 57 (87.7) 64 (85.3) 0.023
Holding the breath
1st visit 38 (50.7) 24 (52.2) 34 (75.6) 39 (52.7) 32 (40.0) 0.005
2nd visit 50 (80.6) 31 (81.6) 32 (84.2) 45 (69.2) 54 (72.0) 0.186

Values are presented as number (%) of patients performing the device correctly to the total number of patients. Inhalation included coordination between inhalation and actuation. Fisher exact test was done. 1st visit patients n=320, 2nd visit patients n=278 (Evohaler, n=62; Respimat, n=38; Turbuhaler, n=38; Ellipta, n=65; and Breezhaler/Handihaler, n=75).