Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;7:25. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00748-1

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics of participants

Characteristic N = 30
Age range (mean) 65–85 (72)
Gender
 Female, n (%) 14 (46.7)
Ethnicity
 Chinese, n (%) 22 (73.3)
 Malay, n (%) 5 (16.7)
 Indian, n (%) 2 (6.7)
 Eurasian, n (%) 1 (3.3)
Housing typea
 3 room apartment, n (%) 5 (16.7)
 4 room apartment, n (%) 4 (13.3)
 5 room or executive apartment, n (%) 14 (46.7)
 Condominium or other apartments, n (%) 5 (16.7)
 Landed property, n (%) 2 (6.7)
Education level
 Primary, n (%) 3 (10)
 Secondary, n (%) 16 (53.3)
 College/University, n (%) 11 (36.7)
Living situation
 Alone 3 (10)
 With others, n (%) 27 (90)
Personal mobility
 Independent 27 (90)
 Use of walking stick, n (%) 3 (10)
History of falls in the last one year
 0 17 (56.7)
 1 or more 13 (43.3)
History of near-falls in last one month
 0 20 (66.7)
 1 or more 10 (33.3)
History of near falls in last one year
 Never or rarely 19 (63.3)
 Experience occasional or frequent 11 (36.7)
Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (points)
 0–3 26 (87.7)
 4–7 4 (13.3)
Timed up and go test (seconds)
 < 9.0 14 (46.7)
 9.1–10.0 6 (20)
 10.1–11.0 6 (20)
 11.1–12.0 4 (13.3)
Able to complete Hand Reaction Time Test 30 (100)
Preferred mode of communication
 Daily telephone calls only 2 (6.7)
 Daily text messages only 19 (63.3)
 Daily telephone calls &/or text messages only 9 (30)

aHousing type—a person’s affordability of different types of housing reflected by the type of property with private condominium or other apartments and landed property being more expensive option compared to public housing, e.g. 3-, 4-, 5-room apartments. There are increasing governmental efforts to have more elderly-friendly and barrier-free environment for both public and private housing [32]