Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 1;225:117515. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117515

Table 1.

Randomized Controlled Trials of DBS for Depression

Study N Target Stimulation Settings Responder Criteria Remission Criteria At End of Trial Responders | Remitters Primary Study Endpoint Met?
Subcallosal Cingulate (SCC) (Holtzheimer et al. 2017) 90 SCG 130 Hz ≥ 40% reduction in MADRS from baseline MADRS ≤ 10 Control Group: 5 (17%)
Treatment Group: 12 (20%)
Control Group:2 (7%)
Treatment Group:3 (5%)
No
Internal Capsule (VC/VS) (Dougherty et al. 2015) 30 VC/VS Variable, primarily 130 Hz ≥ 50% reduction on MADRS from baseline Not assessed Control Group: 3 (20%)
Treatment Group: 2 (14.3%)
N/A No
(Bergfeld et al. 2016) 25 vALIC 130 Hz–180 Hz ≥50% reduction of the HAM-D-17 score compared with baseline Not assessed 10 (40%) N/A Yes
Medial Forebrain Bundle (MFB) (Fenoy et al. 2016) 4 (Ongoing) MFB 130 Hz 50% improvement on MADRS Not assessed 3 (75%) N/A Ongoing
(Coenen et al. 2019) 16 siMFB 130 Hz ≥ 50% reduction in MADRS MADRS < 10 16 (100%) 8 (50%) No