. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 15.

Published in final edited form as: Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2020 Feb 15;5(4):29–38. doi: 10.1249/tjx.0000000000000116

Table 3.

Model fit statistics for non-mediated path analyses examining relationships between engagement variables and weight loss outcomes.

	Χ²(df)	RMSEA(90%CI)	CFI	SRMR

Engagement variable partial correlations	54.69(6)	.057(.044, .071)	.959	.016

Engagement variables on PA-T group	49.63(6)	.054(.041, .068)	.970	.014
Non-sig predictors removed	45.89(17)	.026(.017, .035)	.977	.044

WL outcomes on engagement variables
Total weight loss	54.73(6)	.057(.044, .071)	.774	.016
Non-sig predictors removed	15.88(6)	.027(.011, .043)	.925	.019
% weight loss	28.96(6)	.039(.026, .054)	.851	.013
Non-sig predictors removed	3.22(3)	.005(<.001, .035)	.996	.008
Achieved 5% weight loss	54.65(6)	.057(.044, .071)	.835	.015
Non-sig predictors removed	29.03(6)	.039(.026, .054)	.896	.019
Journal count also removed	29.03(6)	.039(.026, .054)	.901	.021
Testing for interaction between sig predictors	52.10(12)	.038(.028, .049)	.819	.029

Sig: Significant. WL: weight loss. RMSEA: Root mean squared error of approximation. CFI: Comparative fit index. SRMR: Standardized root mean squared residual.