Table 2.
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative BCVA, CFT, and the thickness of EIFL in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes.
| Time point | BCVA (logMAR) | CFT (µm) | The thickness of EIFL (µm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | p valuea | Mean ± SD | p valuea | Mean ± SD | pvaluea | |
| Preoperative | 0.47 ± 0.16 | 480.08 ± 60.47 | 183.41 ± 89.5 | |||
| Post-1M | 0.38 ± 0.18 | 0.008∗ | 384.03 ± 41.55 | <0.001∗ | 104.18 ± 46.13 | 0.012∗ |
| Post-6M | 0.25 ± 0.14 | 0.001∗ | 360.03 ± 44.84 | <0.001∗ | 93.25 ± 27.1 | 0.028∗ |
| Post-12M | 0.20 ± 0.13 | <0.001∗ | 342.63 ± 42.46 | <0.001∗ | 80.5 ± 37.3 | 0.003∗ |
a P value vs. preoperative; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CFT, central foveal thickness; EIFL, ectopic inner foveal layer.