Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 5;2021:8854418. doi: 10.1155/2021/8854418

Table 2.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pure DCIS between this and published studies.

Characteristics Subgroup Our study SEER 2015 NSABP-B24 EORTC SweDCIS B17 Canada Nottingham 2019 UCSD 2020
Year of research 2005–2015 1988–2011 1986–2009 1986–1996 1987–1999 1985–1990 1994–2003 1990–2012 2010–2016

No. of patients 617 108.196 2.061 1010 1046 790 571 651 1540

Detection method Symptomatic 58.7% 8.7% 27.2% 27.6% 8.1% 48%
Screening 39.4% 82.6% 71.6% 72.4% 80.8% 52%

Age (years) ≤50 y 56.7% 33.9% 33.5% 24.1% 33.3% 19.3%
>50 y 43.3% 66.1% 66.5% 75.9% 66.7% 80.7%

Tumor size (cm) ≤2.0 cm 78.1% 77.0% 94.2% 91.2% 67.5% 87.8%
>2.0 cm 21.9% 23.0% 4.3% 8.8% 21.8% 8.9%

Nuclear grade Low-intermediate 77.4% 54.0% 54.0% 62.3% 50.2% 67.7% 39.2% 57.3%
High 20.9% 46.0% 42.3% 37.7% 49.8% 32.3% 60.8% 42.7%

ER status Positive 76.3% 42.5% 28.6% 52.7% 94.7% 75.3% 84.2%
Negative 19.3% 8.2% 8.3% 19.8% 5.3% 24.7% 15.5%
NA 4.4% 49.2% 63.1% 27.5% 0.3%

PR status Positive 69.0% 44.3% 46.7% 74.2%
Negative 26.3% 23.1% 53.3% 25.2%
NA 3.7% 32.7% 0.6%

SEER: surveillance, epidemiology, and end results; NSABP: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project; EORTC: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; SweDCIS: Swedish ductal carcinoma in situ; UCSD: University of California, San Diego; other abbreviations as in Table 1.