TABLE 1.

Performance Metrics of Different models

	Bias (%) [95% CI]	RMSE (mg/L) [95% CI]	Bias (%) [95% CI]	RMSE (mg/L) [95% CI]
	All patients—a priori predictions (159 observations, 49 patients)		All patients—a posteriori predictions (110 observations, 43 patients)
Adane et al1	−20.0 [−30.1 to −9.97]	5.49 [4.58 to 6.41]	−12.4 [−19.2 to −5.51]	3.52 [2.89 to 4.15]
Carreno et al2	−1.4 [−11.1 to 8.26]	4.43 [3.48 to 5.38]	−7.54 [−13.9 to −1.22]	3.27 [2.60 to 3.94]
Colin et al5	−7.0 [−16.1 to 2.13]	4.34 [3.40 to 5.27]	1.96 [−4.03 to 7.94]	2.75 [2.21 to 3.29]
Crass et al3	21.1 [7.29 to 34.8]	5.93 [4.75 to 7.11]	−6.54 [−13.9 to 0.84]	3.65 [2.87 to 4.43]
Goti et al6	26.2 [12.2 to 40.2]	6.12 [4.99 to 7.24]	17.2 [6.71 to 27.6]	4.45 [3.55 to 5.36]
Smit et al4	−41.9 [−49.9 to −33.8]	7.16 [5.86 to 8.45]	−10.8 [−18.4 to −3.12]	3.71 [2.82 to 4.60]
	Class I obese—a priori predictions (81 observations, 25 patients)		Class I obese—a posteriori predictions (56 observations, 21 patients)
Adane et al1	−28.4 [−41.8 to −14.9]	5.97 [4.69 to 7.26]	−13.8 [−24.2 to −3.37]	3.82 [2.73 to 4.92]
Carreno et al2	1.81 [−12.5 to 16.1]	4.29 [2.91 to 5.68]	−8.18 [−18.2 to 1.89]	3.23 [2.26 to 4.21]
Colin et al5	−4.14 [−20.0 to 11.7]	4.93 [3.42 to 6.44]	4.56 [−5.27 to 14.4]	2.96 [2.10 to 3.83]
Crass et al3	19.2 [−4.76 to 43.1]	6.73 [4.73 to 8.73]	−6.07 [−16.3 to 4.10]	3.11 [2.13 to 4.09]
Goti et al6	31.4 [8.09 to 54.8]	6.77 [4.75 to 8.80]	21.8 [3.88 to 39.8]	5.14 [3.44 to 6.85]
Smit et al4	−39.7 [−53.1 to −26.2]	7.30 [5.24 to 9.36]	−5.66 [−17.2 to 5.90]	3.22 [1.93 to 4.51]
	Class II obese—a priori predictions (32 observations, 9 patients)		Class II obese—a posteriori predictions (23 observations, 9 patients)
Adane et al1	−15.1 [−34.8 to 4.73]	4.16 [2.79 to 5.54]	−11.0 [−20.6 to −1.32]	3.06 [1.90 to 4.22]
Carreno et al2	−6.40 [−23.8 to 11.0]	3.36 [1.82 to 4.89]	−12.7 [−25.3 to −0.04]	3.32 [2.11 to 4.52]
Colin et al5	−4.12 [−23.2 to 15.0]	3.17 [1.64 to 4.71]	−0.36 [−16.9 to 16.1]	2.44 [1.35 to 3.53]
Crass et al3	29.7 [9.10 to 50.2]	4.56 [2.50 to 6.63]	−12.1 [−27.1 to 2.86]	3.48 [2.24 to 4.73]
Goti et al6	34.4 [−1.07 to 69.9]	6.44 [4.40 to 8.48]	12.3 [−13.3 to 37.9]	4.18 [2.82 to 5.54]
Smit et al4	−42.8 [−64.3 to −21.2]	6.88 [2.92 to 10.8]	−12.0 [−28.4 to 4.49]	3.64 [2.27 to 5.02]
	Class III obese—a priori predictions (46 observations, 15 patients)		Class III obese—a posteriori predictions (31 observations, 13 patients)
Adane et al1	−9.06 [−32.1 to 14.0]	5.49 [3.35 to 7.64]	−11.0 [−27.6 to 5.52]	3.34 [2.27 to 4.42]
Carreno et al2	−3.75 [−25.1 to 17.6]	5.31 [3.21 to 7.41]	−2.97 [−15.6 to 9.65]	3.30 [1.65 to 4.95]
Colin et al5	−13.5 [−26.1 to −0.83]	4.04 [2.36 to 5.72]	−0.64 [−9.53 to 8.24]	2.63 [1.53 to 3.73]
Crass et al3	19.1 [−3.5 to 41.7]	5.41 [3.60 to 7.21]	−3.43 [−21.5 to 14.6]	4.63 [2.58 to 6.68]
Goti et al6	12.5 [−6.5 to 31.4]	5.49 [3.35 to 7.64]	13.0 [−2.19 to 28.3]	3.53 [2.51 to 4.56]
Smit et al4	−45.0 [−56.6 to −33.3]	7.09 [5.20 to 8.98]	−18.2 [−33.8 to −2.53]	4.54 [2.39 to 6.69]

Models with the smallest absolute mean bias and lowest root mean square error of each group are indicated in bold.

CI, confidence interval.