Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;11:567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80783-3

Table 3.

Comparison of ventricular volume estimation bey ultrasonography.

Año Studied population Method Automatic segmentation Accuracy, reliability and/or gold standard comparation
Csutak et al. 2003 250 healthy infants. Age range from 26 weeks of GA to 6 months Traced the area of seven to ten sections for each ventricle and multiply by the distance between them No No
Kishimoto et al. 2016 26 preterm infants. 11 with moderate to severe IVH Motorized device. 2D US images used to build a 3D US. Images were manually segmented in parallel sagittal slices 1 mm apart No Yes. Compared 3D US to 3D MRI manual segmentation
Qiu et al. 2017 14 preterm infants. 4 with moderate to severe IVH. 70 3D US Motorized device (same as in Kishimoto et al.). 3D US built from 2D US. Developed a multiatlas segmentation method Yes Yes. Mean DSC of 86.4% ± 8.3%
Gontard et al. 2020 10 preterm infants with PHVD. 152 3D US scans Specific 3d transducer (SVNA5-8B, 5–8 MHz). Developed a deep learning automatic segmentation method Yes Yes. Mean DSC 87% in training data. Mean DSC 80% in validation data

GA gestational age, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, DSC dice similarity coefficient, PHVD post haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation.