Table 2.
Comparison between the proposed UANS with other processes.
Process | Feedstock | Acid solution | Reaction time, min | Temperature, °C | Nitrogen content, % | Substitution degree | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mechanical Stirring | Miscanthus cellulose | 54.6% of concentrated H2SO4 + 37% of concentrated HNO3 + 6.4% of H2O | 40 | 95 | 11.9 | 2.20 | [13] |
Fermentation* | Bacterial cellulose | 75% of concentrated H2SO4 + 25% of concentrated HNO3 | 30 | 80 | 13.7 | 2.85 | [14] |
Mechanical Stirring | Alfa grass fibers | 72% of concentrated H2SO4 + 28% of concentrated HNO3 | 35 | 40 | 12.5 | 2.43 | [37] |
UANS | Microcrystalline cellulose | 54.6% of concentrated H2SO4 + 37.0% of concentrated HNO3 + 6.4% of H2O | 30 | 30 | 12.5 | 2.45 | This work |
Physical properties and explosive performance were not similar to conventional product.