. 2021 Jan 12;11:844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80670-x

Table 4.

Comparisons of the proposed method with the latest methods.

Species	Method	Acc	Sp	Sn	MCC	AUC
S. cerevisiae ( $S_{1}$ )	iRO-3wPseKNC³⁵	0.730	0.752	0.707	0.459	0.808
	iRO-PseKGCC³⁶	0.764	0.781	0.739	0.530	0.813
	iORI-PseKNC2.0²⁸	0.782	0.802	0.763	0.565	0.831
	XGBoosting based method³²	0.895	0.938	0.852	0.793	–
	The proposed method	0.975	0.966	0.983	0.940	0.975
S. pombe ( $S_{2}$ )	iRO-3wPseKNC³⁵	0.965	0.949	0.979	0.929	0.986
S. pombe ( $S_{2}$ )	The proposed method	0.765	0.780	0.750	0.530	0.800
K. lactis ( $S_{3}$ )	iRO-3wPseKNC³⁵	0.851	0.845	0.858	0.703	0.901
K. lactis ( $S_{3}$ )	The proposed method	0.885	0.912	0.858	0.771	0.888
P. pastoris ( $S_{4}$ )	iRO-3wPseKNC³⁵	0.710	0.723	0.699	0.422	0.796
	iRO-PseKGCC³⁶	0.742	0.739	0.745	0.484	0.800
	The proposed method	0.967	0.974	0.960	0.934	0.981