Table 1.
Gene | Patient # | Affected family members | Nucleotide change | Affected exon(s)/intron(s) | Amino acid alteration | gnomAD MAF [%] | Pathogenicity predictions | Splice predictions | ACMG | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CADD | REVEL | M-CAP | Classification | Criteria | ||||||||
FBN1c | 1 | 1 | c.(?_1317)_(1837 + 1_1838-1)del | Upstream of exon 1 and exons 1–15 | p.? | NA | NA | NA | NA | Not done | LP# | PVS1, PM2 |
3 | 1 (de novo)a | c.1130G > A | Exon 10 | p.(Cys377Tyr) | Absent | 33 | 0.927 | 0.915 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PM6, PP2, PP3, PP5 | |
4 | 2 | c.1463G > A | Exon 12 | p.(Cys488Thr) | Absent | 32 | 0.937 | 0.892 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5 | |
5b | 2 | c.(1468 + 1_1469-1)_(1837 + 1_1838-1)del | Exons 13–15 | p.? | NA | NA | NA | NA | Not done | P# | PVS1, PM2, PS4 | |
6b | 3 | c.(1468 + 1_1469-1)_(1837 + 1_1838-1)del | Exons 13–15 | p.? | NA | NA | NA | NA | Not done | P# | PVS1, PM2, PS4, PP1 | |
8 | 2 | c.1867T > A | Exon 16 | p.(Cys623Ser) | Absent | 27.6 | 0.771 | 0.493 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3 | |
9 | 2 | c.2419 + 3delinsTTTTAGATCCATATTTTAG | Intron 20 | p.? | Absent | 14.96 | NA | NA | Impact on splicing | VUS# | PM2, PP3 | |
14 | 1 (de novo)a | c.3589 + 1G > A | Intron 29 | p.? | Absent | 34 | NA | NA | Impact on splicing | P | PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3 | |
16 | 1 | c.3635G > A | Exon 30 | p.(Cys1212Tyr) | Absent | 32 | 0.965 | 0.899 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3 | |
18 | 2 | c.4491C > G | Exon 37 | p.(Cys1497Trp) | Absent | 17.95 | 0.768 | 0.820 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3 | |
21 | 2 | c.4817-1_4819delGATA | Intron 39/exon 40 | p.? | Absent | 37 | NA | NA | Impact on splicing | P | PVS1, PM2, PP3 | |
22 | 1 (de novo)a | c.5467_5474dupGAATGCAT | Exon 45 | p.(Ile1825Metfs*71) | Absent | 33 | NA | NA | Not done | P | PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3 | |
25 | 3 | c.5621G > T | Exon 46 | p.(Cys1874Phe) | Absent | 33 | 0.991 | 0.981 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PP1, PP2, PP3 | |
27 | 1 (de novo)a | c.5671 + 1G > C | Intron 46 | p.? | Absent | 33 | NA | NA | Impact on splicing | P | PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3 | |
28 | 1 (de novo)a | c.5917 + 1G > T | Intron 48 | p.? | Absent | 34 | NA | NA | Impact on splicing | P | PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3, PP5 | |
29 | 1 | c.5966G > C | Exon 49 | p.(Cys1989Ser) | Absent | 25.2 | 0.818 | 0.946 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3 | |
30 | 3 | c.5993G > T | Exon 49 | p.(Cys1998Phe) | Absent | 33 | 0.956 | 0.928 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP1, PP2, PP3 | |
32 | 2 | c.(7204 + 1_7205-1)_(7819 + 1_7820-1)del | Exons 59–63 | p.? | NA | NA | NA | NA | Not done | LP# | PVS1, PM2 | |
34 | 2 | c.7817T > A | Exon 63 | p.(Val2606Asp) | Absent | 33 | 0.665 | 0.270 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3 | |
SKId | 38 | 1 (de novo)a | c.104C > G | Exon 1 | p.(Pro35Arg) | Absent | 23.6 | 0.759 | 0.964 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PM6, PP3 |
TGFBR2e | 43 | 1 | c.1453C > A | Exon 6 | p.(Arg485Ser) | Absent | 29.4 | 0.868 | 0.374 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3 |
44 | 1 (de novo)a | c.1454G > C | Exon 6 | p.(Arg485Pro) | Absent | 33 | 0.937 | 0.427 | Not done | LP | PM1, PM2, PM5, PM6, PP2, PP3 |
The functional impact of the identified variants was predicted by the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) tool, the Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner (REVEL) scoring system, and the Mendelian Clinically Applicable Pathogenicity (M-CAP) Score. CADD is a framework that integrates multiple annotations in one metric by contrasting variants that survived natural selection with simulated mutations. Reported CADD scores are phred-like rank scores based on the rank of that variant’s score among all possible single nucleotide variants of hg19, with 10 corresponding to the top 10%, 20 at the top 1%, and 30 at the top 0.1%. The larger the score the more likely the variant has deleterious effects; the score range observed here is strongly supportive of pathogenicity, with all observed variants ranking above ~ 99% of all variants in a typical genome and scoring similarly to variants reported in ClinVar as pathogenic (~ 85% of which score > 15)61. REVEL is an ensemble method predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants with a strength for distinguishing pathogenic from rare neutral variants with a score ranging from 0 to 1. The higher the score the more likely the variant is pathogenic62. M-CAP is a classifier for rare missense variants in the human genome, which combines previous pathogenicity scores (including SIFT, Polyphen-2, and CADD), amino acid conservation features and computed scores trained on mutations linked to Mendelian diseases. The recommended pathogenicity threshold is > 0.02563. Splice site prediction scores were calculated for wild-type and mutated sequences by using the programs Human Splicing Finder 3.1, NetGene2, and the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project Database65–68. Genetic tolerance at the affected amino acid position in the protein was predicted by MetaDome64. All variants were classified according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) either by use of an adjusted automated interpretation by VarSome (https://varsome.com/)60or in case of whole exon deletions and Indels (#) by manual application of the guidelines.
LP likely pathogenic, NA not applicable, P pathogenic, VUS variant of unclear significance.
aPaternity not confirmed.
bApparently non-consanguineous families.
cFBN1 mRNA reference number: NM_000138.4.
dSKI mRNA reference number: NM_003036.3.
eTGFBR2 mRNA reference number: NM_001024847.2.