Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;11:764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80755-7

Table 1.

Number of affected family members, in silico pathogenicity predictions and ACMG classification for novel variants found in the cohort.

Gene Patient # Affected family members Nucleotide change Affected exon(s)/intron(s) Amino acid alteration gnomAD MAF [%] Pathogenicity predictions Splice predictions ACMG
CADD REVEL M-CAP Classification Criteria
FBN1c 1 1 c.(?_1317)_(1837 + 1_1838-1)del Upstream of exon 1 and exons 1–15 p.? NA NA NA NA Not done LP# PVS1, PM2
3 1 (de novo)a c.1130G > A Exon 10 p.(Cys377Tyr) Absent 33 0.927 0.915 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PM6, PP2, PP3, PP5
4 2 c.1463G > A Exon 12 p.(Cys488Thr) Absent 32 0.937 0.892 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5
5b 2 c.(1468 + 1_1469-1)_(1837 + 1_1838-1)del Exons 13–15 p.? NA NA NA NA Not done P# PVS1, PM2, PS4
6b 3 c.(1468 + 1_1469-1)_(1837 + 1_1838-1)del Exons 13–15 p.? NA NA NA NA Not done P# PVS1, PM2, PS4, PP1
8 2 c.1867T > A Exon 16 p.(Cys623Ser) Absent 27.6 0.771 0.493 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3
9 2 c.2419 + 3delinsTTTTAGATCCATATTTTAG Intron 20 p.? Absent 14.96 NA NA Impact on splicing VUS# PM2, PP3
14 1 (de novo)a c.3589 + 1G > A Intron 29 p.? Absent 34 NA NA Impact on splicing P PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3
16 1 c.3635G > A Exon 30 p.(Cys1212Tyr) Absent 32 0.965 0.899 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3
18 2 c.4491C > G Exon 37 p.(Cys1497Trp) Absent 17.95 0.768 0.820 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3
21 2 c.4817-1_4819delGATA Intron 39/exon 40 p.? Absent 37 NA NA Impact on splicing P PVS1, PM2, PP3
22 1 (de novo)a c.5467_5474dupGAATGCAT Exon 45 p.(Ile1825Metfs*71) Absent 33 NA NA Not done P PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3
25 3 c.5621G > T Exon 46 p.(Cys1874Phe) Absent 33 0.991 0.981 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PP1, PP2, PP3
27 1 (de novo)a c.5671 + 1G > C Intron 46 p.? Absent 33 NA NA Impact on splicing P PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3
28 1 (de novo)a c.5917 + 1G > T Intron 48 p.? Absent 34 NA NA Impact on splicing P PVS1, PM2, PM6, PP3, PP5
29 1 c.5966G > C Exon 49 p.(Cys1989Ser) Absent 25.2 0.818 0.946 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3
30 3 c.5993G > T Exon 49 p.(Cys1998Phe) Absent 33 0.956 0.928 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PP1, PP2, PP3
32 2 c.(7204 + 1_7205-1)_(7819 + 1_7820-1)del Exons 59–63 p.? NA NA NA NA Not done LP# PVS1, PM2
34 2 c.7817T > A Exon 63 p.(Val2606Asp) Absent 33 0.665 0.270 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3
SKId 38 1 (de novo)a c.104C > G Exon 1 p.(Pro35Arg) Absent 23.6 0.759 0.964 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PM6, PP3
TGFBR2e 43 1 c.1453C > A Exon 6 p.(Arg485Ser) Absent 29.4 0.868 0.374 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3
44 1 (de novo)a c.1454G > C Exon 6 p.(Arg485Pro) Absent 33 0.937 0.427 Not done LP PM1, PM2, PM5, PM6, PP2, PP3

The functional impact of the identified variants was predicted by the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) tool, the Rare Exome Variant Ensemble Learner (REVEL) scoring system, and the Mendelian Clinically Applicable Pathogenicity (M-CAP) Score. CADD is a framework that integrates multiple annotations in one metric by contrasting variants that survived natural selection with simulated mutations. Reported CADD scores are phred-like rank scores based on the rank of that variant’s score among all possible single nucleotide variants of hg19, with 10 corresponding to the top 10%, 20 at the top 1%, and 30 at the top 0.1%. The larger the score the more likely the variant has deleterious effects; the score range observed here is strongly supportive of pathogenicity, with all observed variants ranking above ~ 99% of all variants in a typical genome and scoring similarly to variants reported in ClinVar as pathogenic (~ 85% of which score > 15)61. REVEL is an ensemble method predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants with a strength for distinguishing pathogenic from rare neutral variants with a score ranging from 0 to 1. The higher the score the more likely the variant is pathogenic62. M-CAP is a classifier for rare missense variants in the human genome, which combines previous pathogenicity scores (including SIFT, Polyphen-2, and CADD), amino acid conservation features and computed scores trained on mutations linked to Mendelian diseases. The recommended pathogenicity threshold is > 0.02563. Splice site prediction scores were calculated for wild-type and mutated sequences by using the programs Human Splicing Finder 3.1, NetGene2, and the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project Database6568. Genetic tolerance at the affected amino acid position in the protein was predicted by MetaDome64. All variants were classified according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) either by use of an adjusted automated interpretation by VarSome (https://varsome.com/)60or in case of whole exon deletions and Indels (#) by manual application of the guidelines.

LP likely pathogenic, NA not applicable, P pathogenic, VUS variant of unclear significance.

aPaternity not confirmed.

bApparently non-consanguineous families.

cFBN1 mRNA reference number: NM_000138.4.

dSKI mRNA reference number: NM_003036.3.

eTGFBR2 mRNA reference number: NM_001024847.2.