Table 3.
Patient # | Age at evaluation (years) | Gender | Revised Ghent criteria | Cardiac/vascular manifestations | Ocular features | Systemic score | Clinical diagnosis (pre-test) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46 | 15 | Male | Negative | Tricuspid and mitral valve prolapse with regurgitation | Myopia | Negative | MASS phenotype |
47a | 15 | Female | Negative | Tricuspid and mitral valve prolapse with regurgitations | Absent | Negative | Mitral valve prolapse syndrome |
48 | 22 | Male | Negative | Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm | Absent | Negative | Aortopathy |
49 | 16 | Female | Negative | Mitral valve prolapse regurgitation | Absent | Negative | MASS phenotype |
50 | 13 | Female | Negative | Myxomatous mitral valve with regurgitation | Absent | Negative | Mitral valve prolapse syndrome |
51 | 18 | Male | Negative | Myxomatous mitral valve with regurgitation | Absent | Positive | MASS phenotype |
52b,c | 2 | Male | Negative | Mild aortic root dilatation with ventricular septal defect | Absent | Negative | Aortopathy with facial dysmorphism |
52’s brotherc | 2 | Male | Negative | Absent | Absent | Negative | MASS phenotype |
53d | 15 | Female | Negative | Arteritis | Absent | Positive | Marfanoid disorder |
Revised Ghent criteria ‘negative’ indicates non-fulfillment. Systemic score ‘positive’ indicates systemic involvement (score ≥ 7) and ‘negative’ suggests no systemic involvement (score < 7).
MASS phenotype Mitral valve, Aorta, Skin, and Skeletal features.
aPatient 47 had poor scholastic performance.
bPatient 52 had developmental delay.
cThe difference in the phenotypes of patient 52 and his brother could suggest variable expression.
dPatient 53 had microtia and perauricular tag.