Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 13;21:11. doi: 10.1186/s40644-021-00381-y

Table 1.

Relationship between PD-L1 expression and FDG uptake in review literatures

Authors/References Sample size Cancer type Histology Correlation between FDG uptake and PD-L1 expression Correlation of FDG uptake with TILs
(statistical assessment)
p-value PD-L1 clone
Kasahara N / [8] 167 Lung cancer SCC 0.02 E1L3N Not significant
Kaira K / [9] 315 Lung cancer AC 0.01 E1L3N/28–8 Not significant
Takada K / [7] 579 Lung cancer SCC/AC/other < 0.001 SP142 NA
Zhang M / [10] 84 Lung cancer SCC 0.035 28–8 NA
Kasahara N / [24] 98 Lung cancer SCLC 0.36 E1L3N Significant
Hu B / [25] 362 Lung cancer SCC/AC 0.001 28–8 NA
Wang Y / [27] 122 Lung cancer SCC/AC 0.012 NA Significant
Jiang H / [26] 65 Colon cancer AC 0.000 28–8 NA
Chen R / [15] 63 Bladder cancer UC/SCC/SRC 0.032 NA NA
Zhao L / [28] 84 NPC SCC < 0.001 SP263 NA
Hirakata T / [30] 97 Breast cancer AC < 0.001 28–8 Significant

Abbreviations: PD-L1 programmed death ligand-1, 18F-FDG 2-Deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose, TILs tumor infiltrative lymphocytes, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, AC adenocarcinoma, SCLC small cell lung cancer, UC urothelial cancer, SRC signet ring cell carcinoma, NPC nasopharyngeal carcinoma, NA not applicable