Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;5:78. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00078

Table 2.

Complete offline classifier comparison.

Ipsi. (I) Contra. (C) Bilat. (B)
OVERALL (%)
EMG 8.66 [0.44] 8.83 [0.41] (0.51) 5.01 [0.29]* (2.57 × 10−7)
GONIO 7.13 [0.79] 7.69 [0.74] (0.35) 2.80 [0.41]* (2.89 × 10−6)
IMU 3.63 [0.35] 3.98 [0.31] (0.09) 2.26 [0.23]* (3.43 × 10−5)
ALL-LDA 2.09 [0.27] 2.48 [0.27] (7.19 × 10−3) 1.43 [0.24]* (2.91 × 10−6)
ALL-SVM 2.33 [0.30] 2.62 [0.32] (0.20) 1.64 [0.26]* (1.12 × 10−4)
ALL-ANN 3.07 [0.28] 3.77 [0.29]* (1.52 × 10−3) 2.63 [0.26] (6.26 × 10−3)
*α = 0.05/16 p-value p-value
STEADY-STATE (%)
EMG 6.61 [0.41] 6.76 [0.32] (0.55) 3.26 [0.22]* (1.89 × 10−6)
GONIO 6.59 [0.85] 7.16 [0.75] (0.38) 2.26 [0.38]* (1.21 × 10−5)
IMU 2.60 [0.31] 2.92 [0.28] (0.13) 1.33 [0.19]* (3.34 × 10−5)
ALL-LDA 1.25 [0.19] 1.38 [0.17] (0.24) 0.76 [0.14]* (6.27 × 10−5)
ALL-SVM 1.00 [0.17] 1.14 [0.16] (0.30) 0.71 [0.14] (8.95 × 10−3)
ALL-ANN 1.71 [0.16] 2.04 [0.21] (0.02) 1.55 [0.14] (0.15)
*α = 0.05/12 p-value p-value
TRANSITIONAL (%)
EMG 17.83 [0.78] 18.18 [1.22] (0.67) 12.91[0.85]* (3.02 × 10−7)
GONIO 9.51 [0.82] 10.06 [0.94] (0.46) 5.18 [0.63]* (2.79 × 10−6)
IMU 8.31 [0.74] 8.70 [0.64] (0.36) 6.40 [0.56]* (6.08 × 10−4)
ALL-LDA 5.94 [0.84] 7.42 [0.82]* (9.70 × 10−4) 4.50 [0.76]* (5.19 × 10−4)
ALL-SVM 8.37 [1.04] 9.30 [1.22] (0.19) 5.84 [0.89]* (6.18 × 10−5)
ALL-ANN 9.16 [0.93] 11.52 [0.97]* (6.94 × 10−4) 7.46 [1.00]* (3.91 × 10−3)
*α = 0.05/12 p-value p-value

Error rates (mean [SEM]) are shown for all evaluated classifiers. Asterisks under contralateral denote statistically significant differences between contralateral and ipsilateral sensor sets (p-value). Asterisks under bilateral denote statistically significant differences between bilateral and ipsilateral sensor sets (p-value). The best-performing classifier for each type of error is bolded.