Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 14;6:145. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00145

Table 3.

The questionnaire results for participant of the PCNL access module evaluation.

Metric Mean (SD)
Total (n = 20) Novices (n = 17) Experts (n = 3) p
Haptic Realism Realism of instrument handle 2.7 (1.45) 2.6 (1.50) 3.3 (0.943) 0.57
Realism of the targets 3.4 (1.49) 3.2 (1.54) 4.3 (0.471) 0.24
Realism of the haptic feedback 2.4 (1.39) 2.2 (1.38) 3.3 (0.943) 0.20
Realism (overall) 3.25 (1.51) 3.3 (1.52) 3.0 (1.41) 0.77
Usefulness Hand-eye coordination training 3.8 (1.38) 3.7 (1.45) 4.3 (0.471) 0.49
Rehearsal tool 3.8 (1.37) 3.6 (1.45) 4.3 (0.471) 0.44
Likelihood to recommend 3.6 (1.56) 3.5 (1.65) 4.3 (.0471) 0.40
Image Quality Quality 4.1 (0.624) 4.1 (0.639) 4.3 (0.471) 0.51
Brightness 4.3 (0.781) 4.3 (0.823) 4.3 (0.471) 0.94
Resolution 3.95 (0.920) 3.9 (0.963) 4.3 (0.471) 0.46
Delay in image display 4.05 (0.920) 4.1 (0.937) 4.0 (0.816) 0.92
Comfort 3.9 (1.04) 3.9 (1.08) 4.0 (0.816) 0.87
Realistic (yes) 95% 94.1% 100%