Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 13;11:1019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80185-5

Table 1.

Results of the best GLMM in each set assessing effect of alligator probability and alternative methods of protection on (A) relative colony distance from the mainland (meters) and (B) relative colony distance from landmasses > 5 ha (meters).

Estimate Standard error t value Pr( >|z|)
(A) Relative colony distance from the mainland (m)
(Intercept) 380.46 200.81 1.895 0.0644
Alligator probability, unlikely 1234.14 276.03 4.471  < 0.001
Alligator probability, unlikely: distance to human development (m) − 357.11 324.78 − 1.100 0.2744
Alligator probability, likely: distance to human development (m) 391.74 110.94 3.531  < 0.001
(B) Relative colony distance from landmasses > 5 ha (m)
(Intercept) 257.22 249.74 1.030 0.3097
Alligator probability, unlikely 806.08 356.52 2.261 0.0298
Alligator probability, unlikely: distance to human development (m) 34.50 37.80 0.913 0.3651
Alligator probability, likely: distance to human development (m) 306.47 104.20 2.941 0.0047

Model includes associated colony as a random factor. All continuous variables were scaled.