Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;13(1):63–69. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa020

Table 2.

Univariate comparison of characteristics of women who underwent caesarean birth for a maternal indication compared with those who underwent CBMR at Global Network sites, 2010–2013

Medical indicationa,b CMBR P-value
Variables (N = 28 096) (N = 655) LR/site/clusterc
Maternal age (years), n (%) <0.001
 <20 2566 (9) 56 (9)
 20–35 24 569 (88) 532 (81)
 >35 913 (3) 67 (10)
n = 27 973 n = 651
Maternal education, n (%) 0.005
 No formal schooling 4192 (15) 91 (14)
 Primary school 8089 (29) 217 (33)
 Secondary school 11,306 (40) 234 (36)
 University or higher 4386 (16) 109 (17)
n = 27 986 n = 649
Parity, n (%) 0.3
 0 13 204 (47) 321 (50)
 1–2 11 674 (42) 176 (27)
 ≥3 3108 (11) 152 (23)
n = 28 096 n = 655
BMI, n (%) 0.3
 Underweight 4763 (17) 79 (12)
 Normal 14 232 (51) 271 (41)
 Overweight 4007 (14) 114 (18)
 Obese 5094 (18) 191 (29)
n = 28 080 n = 655
Singleton gestation, n (%) 0.01
 Yes 27 251 (97) 630 (96)
 No 829 (3) 25 (4)
n = 28 017 n = 653
Hypertension, n (%) <0.001
 Yes 2413 (9) 27 (4)
 No 25 604 (91) 626 (96)

aWomen with ‘no indication’ for caesarean birth not included in the analysis.

bMedical indication includes the first six indications in Table 1.

cMultilevel mixed effects regression adjusting for site and cluster.

LR, logistic regression.